增强约束钢管混凝土框架-核心筒结构抗震性能

徐超; 李家富; 丁发兴; 尚志海; 闫思凤; 辛立娟; 许云龙

doi:10.13206/j.gjgS23081101

增强约束钢管混凝土框架-核心筒结构抗震性能

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23081101

徐超^1,2,
李家富^1,2,
丁发兴^3, ,,
尚志海^1,2,
闫思凤^1,2,
辛立娟^1,2,
许云龙³

1. 北京京诚华宇建筑设计研究院有限公司, 北京 100176;
2. 中冶京诚工程技术有限公司, 北京 100176;
3. 中南大学土木工程学院, 长沙 410075

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51978664)。

详细信息

作者简介:
徐超,男,1991年出生,硕士,工程师,xuchao@ceri.com.cn。

通讯作者:
丁发兴,男,1979年出生,博士,教授,dinfaxin@csu.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 140
- HTML全文浏览量: 23
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-08-11
- 网络出版日期: 2024-01-27

Seismic Performance of Enhanced Restrained CFST Frame-Core Tube Structure

Chao Xu^1,2,
Jiafu Li^1,2,
Faxing Ding^{3
, ,},
Zhihai Shang^1,2,
Sifeng Yan^1,2,
Lijuan Xin^1,2,
Yunlong Xu³

1. CERI Architects & Engineers Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China;
2. MCC Capital Engineering & Research Incorporation Ltd., Beijing 100176, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

摘要

摘要: 为了充分发挥钢管混凝土框架-核心筒结构的承载和抗震潜力,提升强震下重要工程结构的安全性,对钢管混凝土框架-核心筒结构体系分别采取柱端拉筋和“强连梁、强墙肢”等增强约束措施,探讨其对位移响应、塑性耗能、震后刚度损伤、二道防线和破坏模式的影响。分析结果显示:
1)核心筒作为结构第一道防线,当结构塑性发展程度较小时,采取“强连梁、强墙肢”增强约束措施对结构变形的影响效果更佳;但随着结构进入塑性大变形阶段,采取柱端拉筋增强约束措施对底部加强区的层间变形的改善效果也很显著。
2)柱端拉筋增强约束措施对外框架二道防线的抗震性能影响显著,内拉筋构造技术提升了钢管混凝土柱的承载能力,保证了超强地震中框架柱不发生严重破坏,使得外框架将承担更大的地震倾覆力矩和剪力,从而协调内筒一起抵抗地震作用,并减缓内筒的损伤和塑性变形发展,有效发挥二道防线的抗震性能,实现整体结构不倒塌。
3)柱端拉筋增强约束措施改善了“强筒弱框”的破坏模式,内拉筋提升了钢管混凝土柱的耗能能力,有效限制了内筒塑性大变形发展,进一步扩大了核心筒墙肢耗能范围,使得墙肢和框架柱的塑性耗能分布更为合理,塑性发展更加均匀,形成了合理的双重防线破坏模式,因而最终减缓了结构整体刚度退化,提升了结构延性和抗震韧性。
- 钢管混凝土框架-核心筒结构 /
- 增强约束 /
- 超强地震 /
- 抗震性能
Abstract: In order to fully utilize the load-bearing capacity and seismic resistance potential of the CFST frame-core tube structure and enhance the safety of important engineering structures under strong earthquakes, the enhanced constraint measures including stirrup-confining concrete at column end and “strengthening coupling beam and wall pier ” were used in the CFST frame-core tube structure system. The influence of these measures on displacement response, plastic energy dissipation, stiffness damage, second line of defense and failure mode were discussed. The analysis results showed that:
1)The core tube as the first line of defense for the structure, when the plastic deformation of the structure is small, the measure of “coupling beam and wall pier strengthened” has a greater impact on structural deformation. However, the measure of column end stirrup-confined has a significant impact on the interlayer deformation of the bottom reinforcement area when in the stage of large plastic deformation.
2)The measure of column end stirrup-confined has a significant impact on the seismic performance of the external frame as a second line of defense. It can enhance the loading-bearing capacity of CFST columns and ensure that the columns in external frame do not suffer serious damage during super strong earthquakes. In this case, more torque and shear force are borne by the external frame, coordinating with the core tube to resist seismic force, reducing the damage and plastic deformation of the core tube, effectively exerting the seismic performance of the second line of defense, and ultimately achieving the goal of not collapsing.
3)The measure of column end stirrup-confined has changed the failure mode of “strong core tube and weak frame”, and improved the energy dissipation capacity of concrete-filled steel tube column， significantly improving the toughness of CFST columns and limiting the displacement of the core tube in large plastic deformation, further expanding the energy dissipation range of the wall pier. At the same time, this measure makes the plastic energy dissipation distribution of wall pier in core tube and CFST columns in external frame more reasonable, forming a reasonable double line of defense failure mode, slowing down the degradation of structural stiffness, improving the ductility and seismic toughness of the structure.
- CFST frame-core tube structure /
- enhanced constraint /
- super strong earthquakes /
- seismic performance

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	丁洁民,吴宏磊,赵昕.我国高度250 m以上超高层建筑结构现状与分析进展[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(3):1-7.
[2]	方义庆,包联进,陈建兴.伸臂桁架对框架-核心筒-伸臂桁架结构侧向受力性能的影响[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(11):130-137.
[3]	刘畅,黄用军,何远明.伸臂桁架工作性能研究和设计建议[J].建筑结构,2013,43(9):57-61.
[4]	徐培福,黄吉锋,肖从真,等.带加强层的框架-核心筒结构抗震设计中的几个问题[J].建筑结构学报, 1999, 20(4):2-10.
[5]	容柏生,李盛勇,陈洪涛,等.中国高层建筑中钢管混凝土柱的应用与展望[J].建筑结构, 2009, 39(9):33-38.
[6]	安东亚,周德源,李亚明.框架-核心筒结构双重抗震防线研究综述[J].结构工程师, 2015, 31(1):191-199.
[7]	任重翠,肖从真,徐培福.墙体受拉对框架-核心筒结构抗震性能的影响[J].建筑结构, 2019, 49(21):22-28.
[8]	陈才华,王翠坤,潘玉华,等.框架-核心筒结构框架剪力调整方法研究[J].建筑结构, 2021, 51(11):8-14.
[9]	刘凯,张崇厚,刘彦生,等.超高层建筑结构中腰桁架和伸臂桁架的应用问题[J].建筑结构, 2019, 49(6):12-16.
[10]	丁发兴,潘志成,罗靓,等.水平地震下钢-混凝土组合框架结构极限抗震与强柱构造[J].钢结构(中英文), 2021, 36(2):26-37.
[11]	Ding F X, Luo L, Wang L P, et al. Pseudo-static tests of terminal stirrup-confined concrete-filled rectangular steel tubular columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 144:135-152.
[12]	丁发兴,刘怡岑,吕飞,等.拉筋接触方式对高轴压比钢管混凝土柱抗震性能影响试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(9):62-72.
[13]	丁发兴,许云龙,王莉萍,等.拉筋对两层两跨钢-混凝土组合框架结构抗震性能的影响[J].工程力学, 2023, 40(4):58-70.
[14]	许云龙,丁发兴,吕飞,等.多维地震下钢管混凝土柱-组合梁框架结构体系抗震性能分析[J].钢结构(中英文), 2023,38(12):27-38.
[15]	Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,1989, 25(3):229-326.
[16]	Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1998, 124(8):892-900.
[17]	钱稼茹,程丽荣,周栋梁.普通箍筋约束混凝土柱的中心受压性能[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 42(10):1369-1373.
[18]	韩林海.钢管混凝土结构:理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.