钢管柱-剪力墙转换节点抗震性能的数值模拟

胡亮; 杨子明; 詹旭; 陈驹

doi:10.13206/j.gjgS23072702

钢管柱-剪力墙转换节点抗震性能的数值模拟

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072702

胡亮^1,2,
杨子明¹,
詹旭³,
陈驹¹

1. 浙江大学建筑工程学院, 杭州 310058;
2. 东方电气集团东方锅炉股份有限公司, 成都 610000;
3. 四川轻工大学自动化与信息工程学院, 四川自贡 643000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目（52078249）

详细信息

作者简介:
胡亮,高级工程师,主要从事电力及环保新能源结构设计,Email: yangziming@zjuedu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 11
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-07-27
- 网络出版日期: 2024-09-19

Numerical Analysis on Seismic Behavior of Steel Tubular Column-Shear Wall Transformation Nodes

1. Institute of Structural EngineeringCollege of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
2. DongFang Boiler Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610000, China;
3. School of Automation and Information Engineering, Sichuan University of Science&Engineering, Zigong, Sichuan 643000, China

摘要

摘要: 为探讨轴向压力和低周往复荷载双重作用下，不同高度混凝土内填充的钢管柱的抗震性能，将有限元模型和试验结果进行比较，验证了有限元建模方法的准确性。基于已验证的有限元模型，围绕滞回曲线、骨架曲线、初始刚度和刚度退化曲线、能量耗能能力，探究核心混凝土高度、核心混凝土强度、外钢管的钢材强度、轴压比和构件的径厚比等参数对钢管柱抗震性能的影响。结果表明：1）核心混凝土的高度对钢管柱的抗震性能影响最为显著，填充混凝土高度较低的钢管柱由于混凝土填充量较小，其峰值荷载和失效位移较低；随着混凝土高度从 1/4 钢管柱高度增加到 1/2钢管柱高度，峰值荷载和失效位移显著提高，循环加载总次数也明显增加，因此，在设计钢管柱时，应特别关注混凝土的填充高度，以确保足够的抗震性能；2）核心混凝土和钢材的强度对抗震性能的影响较小，高强度混凝土和钢材不会显著增加钢管柱的初始刚度，即在一定范围内，可以选择不同的混凝土和钢材材料，而不会对抗震性能产生重大影响，但实际工程中，仍然需要根据具体情况选择合适的材料以满足强度和刚度要求；3）轴压比和构件径厚比的增加可以在一定程度上提高抗震性能，特别是对耗能能力有积极影响，增加轴压比可以提高钢管柱的承载能力，而增加构件的径厚比可以增加钢管柱的刚度，从而增加其抗震性能，因此，在实际设计中，需要综合考虑这两个参数以优化钢管柱的抗震性能。
- 钢管柱 /
- 混凝土 /
- 抗震性能 /
- 数值分析
Abstract: This study investigates the seismic performance of steel columns with different heights of concrete core fill under the combined action of axial compression and low-cycle reversed loading. The comparison between finite element modeling and experimental results is employed to validate the seismic performanceaccuracy of finite element modeling method. The fundamental parameters studied in the finite element model include the height of the core concrete, core concrete strength, steel material strength of the outer steel tube, axial load ratio, and the diameter-to-thickness ratio of the members, among others, all of which have a significant impact on the seismic performance of steel columns. The finite element analysis primarily focuses on hysteresis loops, skeleton curves, initial stiffness, stiffness degradation curves, and energy dissipation capacity. The following findings were obtained: Firstly, the height of the core concrete significantly influences the seismic performance of steel columns. Steel columns with lower concrete fill heights exhibit lower peak loads and failure displacements due to the smaller volume of concrete fill. As the concrete height increases from 0.25 times the column height to 0.5 times the column height, both peak loads and failure displacements increase significantly, along with a notable increase in the total number of cyclic loading cycles. This underscores the importance of considering concrete filling height in the design of steel columns to ensure adequate seismic performance. Secondly, the influence of the strength of the core concrete and steel material on seismic performance is relatively minor. High-strength concrete and steel do not significantly increase the initial stiffness of steel columns. This suggests that within a certain range, different concrete and steel materials can be chosen without a substantial impact on seismic performance. However, practical engineering still requires the selection of appropriate materials based on specific strength and stiffness requirements. Finally, an increase in the axial load ratio and the diameter-to-thickness ratio of members can enhance seismic performance to some extent, particularly in terms of energy dissipation capacity. Increasing the axial load ratio improves the load-carrying capacity of steel columns, while increasing the diameter-to-thickness ratio enhances their stiffness, thereby improving their seismic performance. Therefore, practical design considerations should comprehensively account for take these two parameters into account to optimize the seismic performance of steel columns. In summary, this study, through a detailed parameter analysis, elucidates the significant impact of core concrete height on the seismic performance of steel columns and provides a robust basis for the design and optimization of steel column structures.
- steel tubular column /
- concrete /
- seismic performance /
- numerical analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	Pan X Z, Qiao S F, Li H, et al. Seismic behaviour of a new type of external hoop assembled joint for RC frame-added layer hybrid structure[J]. Structures, 2021, 32:170-193.
[2]	Sivandi-Pour A, Gerami M, Kheyroddin A. Uniform damping ratio for non-classically damped hybrid steel concrete structures[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 14:1-11.
[3]	Griffis L G. Some design considerations for composite-frame structures[J]. Engineering Journal, AISC, 1986,23(2):59-64.
[4]	Gustavo P M, Wight K J. Seismic response of exterior RC columnto-steel beam connections[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2000, 126(10):1113-1121.
[5]	Nguyen X H, Nguyen Q H, Le D D, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of new RCS connection[J]. Structures, 2017(9):53-62.
[6]	Papageorgiou A V, Gantes C J. Equivalent uniform damping ratios for linear irregularly damped concrete/steel mixed structures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(3):418-430.
[7]	Papageorgiou A V, Gantes C J. Equivalent modal damping ratiosfor concrete/steel mixed structures[J]. Computers&Structures,2010, 88(19/20):1124-1136.
[8]	Huang W, Qian J, Zhou Z, et al. An approach to equivalent damping ratio of vertically mixed structures based on response error minimization[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 72:119-128.
[9]	Pan Z, Si Q, Zhou Z, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of seismic performance of hybrid joints with bolted connections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 138:867-876.
[10]	Pan X Z, Li H, Chao H, et al. Hysteretic behavior of a new type of outsourcing hybrid joint[J]. Structures, 2022, 40:88-108.
[11]	Kiani A, Kheyroddin A, Kafi M A, et al. Non-linear study of the method of transition in mixed concrete/steel structures[J/OL]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2023, 170[2023-03-28]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107925.
[12]	Bahri F, Kafi M A, Kheyroddin A. Full-scale experimental assessment of new connection for columns in vertically mixed structures[J/OL]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2019, 28(12)[2019-05-29].https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1629.
[13]	Hwang H J, Eom T S, Park H G, et al. Cyclic loading test for beam-column connections of concrete-filled U-shaped steel beamsand concrete-encased steel angle columns[J/OL]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(11)[2015-01-10].https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000124.
[14]	宗钟凌,曹双寅,张皓,等.混凝土框架顶部钢结构加层连接节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(7):127-132.
[15]	范重,柴会娟,陈巍,等.钢管柱-钢筋混凝土框架转换节点设计研究[J].工程力学,2020,37(6):65-78.
[16]	Gao J Y, Nie X, Ding R, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of a new transfer joint in the steel-concrete vertical hybrid structure[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 174[2020-08-18].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106259.
[17]	高劲洋,聂鑫,丁然,等.钢管柱-混凝土框架非下插转换节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2023, 44(2):119-128.
[18]	Chen J, Yang Z M, Hu L, et al. Behavior of CFRP confined circular CFST columns reinforced with internal latticed steel angles under seismic loading[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2023, 208[2023-07-01]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108033.
[19]	韩林海.钢管混凝土结构[M]. 3版.北京:科学出版社,2000.
[20]	Xu F, Wang J, Chen J, et al. Load-transfer mechanism in angleencased CFST members under axial tension[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 178:162-178.
[21]	Yang Z M, Chen J, Wang F Y, et al. Seismic performance of circular concrete-filled steel tube columns reinforced with inner latticed steel angles[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2023,205[2023-03-27]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107908.
[22]	张劲,王庆扬,胡守营,等. ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数验证[J].建筑结构,2008(8):127-130.
[23]	Sheehan T, Dai X H, Chan T M, et al. Structural response of concrete-filled elliptical steel hollow sections under eccentric compression[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 45:314-323.
[24]	Liu F Q, Wang Y Y, Chan T M. Behaviour of concrete-filled cold-formed elliptical hollow sections with varying aspect ratios[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 110:47-61.
[25]	Wang J, Chen J, Qiu W J, et al. Analysis of CFRP-confinedCFST columns reinforced with steel angles under axial compression[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 199[2022-10-30].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107644.
[26]	Yin F, Xue S D, Cao W L, et al. Experimental and analytical study of seismic behavior of special-shaped multicell composite concrete-filled steel tube columns[J/OL]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(1)[2019-10-28]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002442.
[27]	Chen Z H, Dong S H, Du Y S. Experimental study and numerical analysis on seismic performance of FRP confined high-strength rectangular concrete-filled steel tube columns[J/OL]. Thin-Walled Structures,2021,162[2021-02-22]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107560.