Research on Seismic Performance of a Steel Frame Structure with Flat Steel Tubular Column and X-Type Brace
-
摘要: 钢结构具有自重轻、强度高、抗震性能好、易于装配等特点,是最理想的住宅之一,近年来在国家和地方政策的倡导下取得了较大的发展。传统钢结构住宅主要采用钢框架结构、钢框架支撑结构、钢框架剪力墙结构等,然而这些结构体系普遍存在“凸梁凸柱”问题,影响建筑使用空间和居住体验。为此,在传统钢框架结构的基础上提出了一种扁钢管柱-X型支撑钢框架结构,该结构体系采用截面宽度在200 mm以内的扁钢管柱和窄翼缘钢梁,并通过设置X型支撑来增大结构抗侧刚度,可以较好地解决“凸梁凸柱”问题。针对该新型结构体系,开展了以下工作:1)利用PKPM结构设计软件对分别采用扁钢管柱-X型支撑钢框架结构和传统钢框架结构的某学校学生宿舍楼进行了多遇地震作用下的结构受力性能及整体指标分析,包括结构周期、地震作用下结构最大层间位移角和最小刚度比,并对比了两种结构体系的用钢量;2)利用SAUSAGE软件选择了2条天然地震波和1条人工地震波,对该结构体系进行了罕遇地震下的结构弹塑性分析,统计了结构在各地震工况下的弹塑性层间位移角以及构件性能水平;3)利用MIDAS FEA有限元软件对该体系基本结构单元进行了静力推覆分析,得到了其破坏模式和延性性能。研究结果表明:1)通过合理布置扁钢管柱-X型支撑单元,结构在多遇地震作用下的各项指标均满足GB50011—2010《建筑抗震设计规范》要求,同时具有一定的经济性,与传统钢框架结构相比节约用钢量3%左右。2)结构在罕遇地震作用下表现出良好的抗震性能,大部分构件均未出现中度以上损坏,各工况下结构最大弹塑性层间位移角均小于1/50,满足GB 50011—2010要求。3)通过静力有限元推覆分析计算得出结构位移延性系数为8.5,表明结构具备良好的延性和抗推覆性能,同时可以看出柱在与支撑相连部位有较明显的损坏,因此后续可对该部位进行加强构造措施。Abstract: With the features of light weight, high strength, good seismic performance and easy assembly, steel structure is one of the most ideal residences, and it has made great development in recent years under the advocacy of national and local policies. Traditional steel structure residential mainly adopts steel frame structure, steel frame support structure, steel frame shear wall structure, etc. However, these structural systems generally have the problem of “convex beams and columns”, which affects the use of building space and living experience. For this reason, this paper proposes a kind of a steel frame ftructure with flat steel tubular column and X-type brace on the basis of traditional steel frame structure, which adopts flat steel tube columns with cross-section width of 200 mm or less and narrow flange steel beams, and increases the lateral stiffness of the structure through the setting of X-type support, which can solve the problem of “convex beams and columns” better. For this new structural system, the following work is carried out in this paper: 1) PKPM structural design software is used to analyze the structural mechanical performance and overall index of a student dormitory building which adopts flat steel tubular column X-type supported steel frame structure and traditional steel frame structure respectively under multiple earthquakes, including the structural period, the maximum interstory displacement angle and the minimum stiffness ratio of the structure under earthquake action, and the steel amount used in the two structural systems is compared. 2) Elastic-plastic analysis of the structural system under rare earthquakes was carried out by selecting two natural seismic waves and one artificial seismic wave using SAUSAGE software, and the elastic-plastic interlayer displacement angle and member performance level of the structure under each seismic condition were statistically analyzed. 3) the static pushover analysis of the basic structural units of the system was carried out by using MIDAS FEA finite element software, and its failure mode and ductility performance were analyzed. The research results show that: 1) Through the reasonable arrangement of flat steel tubular column X-type support unit, the structure meets the requirements of the Code for Seismic Design of Building (GB 50011—2010) under the action of multiple earthquakes, and has a certain economy, and the steel consumption is saved about 3% compared with the traditional steel frame structure. 2) The structure shows good seismic performance under rare earthquakes, and most of the components are not damaged above moderate level, and the maximum elasticplastic interlayer displacement angle of the structure under each working condition is less than 1/ 50, which meets the code GB 50011— 2010. 3) Through the static finite element pushover analysis, the calculation of the structural displacement ductility coefficient is 8. 5, which indicates that the structure has good ductility and pushover resistance, at the same time, it can be seen that the column has more obvious damage in the part connected with the support, so the subsequent strengthening construction measures can be carried out for this part.
-
[1] 洪奇,陈聚磊,盛凯,等.隐式框架钢结构住宅体系在工程中的应用[J].建筑技术,2018,49(增刊):62-79. [2] 洪奇,董升强,陈聚磊.隐式框架钢结构宽钢管柱构件制作工艺[J].建筑技术,2018,49(增刊):95-96. [3] 付波,童根树,洪奇,等.考虑整体和构件几何缺陷的隐式框架支撑结构动力弹塑性二阶效应分析[J].建筑结构,2020,50(3):5-12. [4] 张鹏,周新刚,苗志华,等.剪跨比1.5的钢管束混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构,2020,50(5):109-115. [5] 张晓萌.钢管束组合剪力墙抗震性能试验及理论研究[D].天津:天津大学,2016. [6] 宋维国.两侧带加劲肋的钢管束-混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[D].烟台:烟台大学,2021. [7] 周雄亮,舒赣平,周观根,等.桁架式多腔体钢板组合剪力墙短墙轴压性能试验研究[J].工业建筑,2020,50(3):1-7,12. [8] 韩建红,周观根,舒赣平,等.桁架式多腔体钢板组合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].工业建筑,2020,50(3):13-18,50. [9] Du E F,Shu G P,Qin L,et al.Numerical analysis on fire performance of sandwich composite wall with truss connectors[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2023,204:1-14. [10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016. [11] 中国工程建设标准化协会.隐式钢管混凝土结构技术规程:T/CECS 951-2021[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2021.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 134
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0