Evolution of Notional Load Approach
-
摘要: 回顾了假想荷载的来龙去脉,介绍了中国、欧洲和美国规范中对假想荷载法的规定,提出了假想荷载系数公式中的总楼层数应解读为施加假想力的楼层以上的楼层总数,以规避现行假想荷载法取值在逻辑上的一个漏洞,并提出了新的建议公式,新公式在逻辑上更加合理,数值上也更有规律。Abstract: A brief review is given for the notional load approach, and clauses in the codes GB 50017, Eurocode 3 and AISC 360 are introduced. A new understanding is proposed for the total story number in the current code formulae, which is reinterpreted as the story number above the story at which the notional load exerts. Such a new explanation avoids the logical defect of the traditional notional load approach. A new equation is proposed for the notional load computation.
-
Key words:
- notional load /
- second order analysis /
- stability
-
[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018. [2] Bridge R Q,Clarke M J,Leon R T,et al.Effective length and notional load approach for assessing frame stability:implications for american steel design[M].Chicago:Task Committee on Effective Length,ASCE,1997. [3] 童根树.钢结构的平面内稳定[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015. [4] European Committee for Standardization(ECS).Eurocode 3:design of steel structures-part 1-1:general rules and rules for buildings:EC 3-1-1[S].Brussels:ECS,2005. [5] American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).Specification for structural steel buildings:ANSI/AISC 360-16[S].Brussels:AISC,2016. [6] 童根树.钢结构与钢-混凝土组合结构设计方法[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2022.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 124
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 25
- 被引次数: 0