高强钢管混凝土柱-铝合金屈曲约束支撑结构的地震易损性分析

李帼昌; 魏骊蓉; 邱增美; 刘旭

doi:10.13206/j.gjgS22120201

高强钢管混凝土柱-铝合金屈曲约束支撑结构的地震易损性分析

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120201

1. 沈阳建筑大学土木工程学院, 沈阳 110168;
2. 深圳市特区建工钢构有限公司, 广东深圳 518053

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金重点项目(51938009)。

详细信息

作者简介:
李帼昌,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事钢-混凝土组合结构等的研究。

通讯作者:
魏骊蓉,wlr9570319@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 91
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-12-02
- 网络出版日期: 2024-08-16

Seismic Fragility Analysis of High-Strength Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column-Aluminum Alloy Buckling Restrained Braces Structure System

1. School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China;
2. Shenzhen Special Zone Construction Steel Structure Co., Shenzhen 518053, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究高强钢管混凝土柱-铝合金屈曲约束支撑结构体系(HSC-SB-ALAB)在不同强度地震动作用下的失效概率,基于增量动力分析(IDA)方法,选取近场脉冲型地震动、远场地震动、近场非脉冲型地震动和综合地震动四组共45条强震记录对一个10层HSC-SB-ALAB结构体系进行了地震易损性分析,得到了结构在4种地震类型作用下的易损性曲线,给出了结构在多遇地震、设防地震和罕遇地震时达到各个极限状态的概率,计算并评价了结构的倒塌储备系数。
研究结果表明:近场脉冲型地震动作用下结构达到各极限状态的概率最大,远场地震动作用下的超越概率最小;结构在各种类型地震动的作用下,倒塌概率仅为1%左右,满足“小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒”的抗震设防目标,倒塌储备系数均大于FEMA P695中要求的最小值2.47,是其他类型钢管混凝土结构的1.34~1.43倍。
- 高强材料 /
- 钢管混凝土 /
- 屈曲约束支撑 /
- 增量动力分析 /
- 易损性分析
Abstract: In order to study the failure probability of the high-strength CFST-aluminum alloy core assembled buckling-restrained braces (HSCSB-ALAB) under different intensity of ground motion, based on the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method, the near-field pulse ground motion, far-field ground motion, near-field ground motion and integrated ground motion were selected. The seismic fragility of a 10 story HSC-SB-ALAB is analyzed by using four groups of 45 strong motion records. The fragility curves of the structure under four earthquake types are obtained; the probability of reaching each limit state of the structure under frequent earthquake, fortified earthquake and rare earthquake is given; and the collapse margin ratio of the structure is calculated and evaluated.
The results show that the probability of reaching each limit state is the largest under the action of near-field impulse ground motion, and the exceeding probability is the smallest under the action of far-field earthquake. Under the action of various types of ground motions, the collapse probability of the structure is only about 1%, which meets the seismic fortification goal of "no damage in small earthquake, repairable in medium earthquake and no collapse in large earthquake". The collapse reserve coefficient is greater than the minimum value of 2. 47 required in FEMA P695, which is 1. 34-1. 43 times that of other types of concrete-filled steel tubular structures.
- high strength materials /
- concrete filled steel tube /
- BRB /
- IDA /
- fragility analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	清华大学土木工程结构专家组,西南交通大学土木工程结构专家组,北京交通大学土木工程结构专家组,等.汶川地震建筑震害分析[J].建筑结构学报, 2008, 29(4):1-9.
[2]	李帼昌,张洪恩.一种双铝合金板装配式屈曲约束支撑:108060727A[P]. 2018-05-22.
[3]	李帼昌,张洪恩,杨志坚,等.新型双铝合金板装配式屈曲约束支撑有限元分析[J].钢结构, 2018, 33(5):57-62.
[4]	李帼昌,王哲渊,闫鹤丹.装配式全角钢约束的铝合金内芯屈曲约束支撑滞回性能试验研究[J/OL].土木工程学报,2023[2023-03-27]. http://doi.org/10. 15951/j.tmgcxb.23020110.
[5]	李帼昌,闫鹤丹,邱增美.装配式双铝合金内芯屈曲约束支撑滞回性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2023,44(5):209-220.
[6]	吕西林,苏宁粉,周颖.复杂高层结构基于增量动力分析法的地震易损性分析[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2012, 32(5):19-25.
[7]	Cornell C A, Jalayer F, Hamburger R O, et al. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines[J]. Journal of Strutural Engineering, 2002, 128(4):526-533.
[8]	叶飞.基于OpenSEES的RC框架结构抗地震倒塌性能分析[D].长沙:湖南大学, 2011.
[9]	吴巧云,朱宏平,樊剑.基于性能的钢筋混凝土框架结构地震易损性分析[J].工程力学, 2012, 29(9):117-124.
[10]	Xu C, Deng J, Peng S, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of steel reinforced concrete frame structures based on different engineering demand parameters[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 20:736-749.
[11]	于晓辉,吕大刚,范峰.基于易损性指数的钢筋混凝土框架结构地震损伤评估[J].工程力学, 2017, 34(1):69-75.
[12]	Sharma V, Shrimali M K, Bharti S D, et al. Seismic fragility evaluation of semi-rigid frames subjected to near-field earthquakes[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021[2021-01-01]. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106384.
[13]	刘晶波,刘阳冰,闫秋实,等.基于性能的方钢管混凝土框架结构地震易损性分析[J].土木工程学报, 2010, 43(2):39-47.
[14]	Mojtaba A, Maryam N, Ali K P. Influence of foundation flexibility on seismic fragility of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings[J/OL]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021[2020-12-17]. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106521.
[15]	Hu S L, Wang W. Comparative seismic fragility assessment of mid-rise steel buildings with non-buckling (BRB and SMA) braced frames and self-centering energy-absorbing dual rocking core system[J/OL]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021[2020-12-17]. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106546.
[16]	Scott B D, Park R, Priestley M. Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1982, 79(1):13-27.
[17]	Mander J, Priestley M. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8):1804-1826.
[18]	Applied Technology Council, Federal Emergency Management Argency (FEMA). Quantification of building seismic performance factors[R]. Washington D C:FEMA, 2008.
[19]	Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings:FEMA 356[R]. Washington D C:FEMA, 2009.
[20]	李文博.基于IDA方法的RC框架结构地震易损性分析研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2012.
[21]	Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Earthquake loss estimation methodology:user's manual:HAZUS99[R]. Washington D C:FEMA, 1999.
[22]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[23]	Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Quantification of building seismic performance factors:FEMA P695[S]. Washington D C:FEMA, 2009.
[24]	孙晓静,杨锋,张海涛.基于IDA的全钢管混凝土框架结构地震易损性研究[J].结构工程师, 2021, 37(1):75-81.
[25]	李贝贝.装配式钢管混凝土框架-屈曲约束支撑结构抗震设计方法及地震易损性分析[D].合肥:合肥工业大学, 2019.