Finite Element Analysis of Double-Through Plate Joint
-
摘要: 常见单板抗剪节点是将一块抗剪连接钢板直接焊接在钢管表面,这种节点连接方式常会造成焊缝周边区域的应力集中,焊缝开裂也是此类节点常见的失效模式。为了实现钢管混凝土柱与钢箱梁的装配式抗剪连接,研究了一种双侧贯通板式节点。节点中,使用两块抗剪连接板分别平行放置于钢管柱两个相对的管壁上的预留槽口中。两贯通板位于钢管内的部分采用钢管内灌注的混凝土进行锚固,钢管外的贯通板部分则分别紧贴钢箱梁的两块腹板,通过高强螺栓将其与梁腹板连接起来。这种装配式连接的施工现场无焊接作业,安装简便,易操作。为此建立了节点有限元模型,并用节点试验结果验证了模型的有效性。在此基础上,采用有限元方法,对原试验节点的设计做了优化改进。通过详细的参数分析,研究了梁柱初始间隙、贯通板厚度、螺栓规格、螺栓孔布置等参数对节点的应力分布、变形特点、承载力、延性、破坏模式等节点性能的影响。
研究表明:相比于贯通板上开椭圆形螺栓孔和使用穿芯螺栓,采用圆形螺栓孔和盲孔螺栓更有利于提高节点的承载力和延性;增大梁末端到钢管表面的初始间隙时,贯通板可以充分发挥其塑性变形能力,节点的转动能力会增强,但间隙过大时,板下部易发生受压屈曲,导致节点失效;增加板的厚度可以增强板的稳定性,提高节点的承载能力,但板的厚度不影响梁末端挤压到钢管表面时所转过的角度大小;螺栓的规格对节点整体的承载力和延性的影响很小,但其对节点的破坏模式的影响却很明显,当螺栓直径较小时易发生剪切破坏;螺栓的布置方式中,两列螺栓孔间过大的水平距离并不能明显改善贯通板的应力分布,边缘距离的增大使得板上的屈服区域充分扩展,增强了贯通板的塑性变形能力,节点的延性较其他节点明显增强,故建议使用五孔或四孔的双列或三列的布置方案,不宜采用单列螺栓孔布置方式。Abstract: The common single plate shear joint is to weld a shear connecting steel plate directly on the surface of the steel pipe. This kind of joint connection often causes the stress concentration around the weld, and weld cracking is also a common failure mode of this kind of joint. To realize the fabricated shear connection between concrete-filled steel tubular column and steel box beam, a double-through plate joint was studied. In the joint, two shear connecting plates were parallel placed in the reserved slots on the two opposite walls of the steel tubular column, respectively. The part of the two through plates in the steel pipe was anchored by the filled concrete, and the plate's part outside the steel pipe was respectively close to the two webs of the steel box beam, which were connected with the beam webs by high-strength bolts. In this way, for the fabricated connection, there is no welding operation on the construction site, and the installation is simple and easy to operate. The finite element model of the joint was established, and the joint test results verified the effectiveness of the model. On this basis, the finite element method was used to optimize the design of the original test joint. Through detailed parameter analysis, the effects of initial gap between beam and column, thickness of through plate, bolt specification, bolt hole layout and other parameters on the joint performance such as stress distribution, deformation characteristics, bearing capacity, ductility and failure mode were studied.
The results show that compared with elliptical bolt holes and through core bolts, circular bolt holes and blind hole bolts are more conducive to improve the bearing capacity and ductility of the joint. With the increase of the initial gap between the end of the beam and the surface of the steel pipe, the through plate can full give play to its plastic deformation ability, and the rotation ability of the joint will be enhanced. However, when the gap is too large, the lower part of the plate is prone to buckling, which can lead to joint failure. Increasing the thickness of the plate can enhance the stability of the plate and improve the bearing capacity of the joint, but the thickness of the plate does not affect the angle of the end of the beam when it is extruded to the surface of the steel pipe. The influence of bolt specification on the overall bearing capacity and ductility of the joint is very small, but its influence on the failure mode of the joint is very obvious. When the bolt diameter is small, it is easy to shear failure. In terms of bolt layout, the excessive horizontal distance between the two bolt holes can not significantly improve the stress distribution. With the increase of the edge distance, the yield region of the plate is fully expanded, the plastic deformation ability of the through plate is enhanced, and ductility of the joint is significantly enhanced. It is suggested to use the layout of five or four holes in double or three rows instead of single row of bolt holes. -
[1] Koduru S D,Driver R G.Generalized component-based model for shear tab connections[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2013,140(2).DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000823. [2] Wen R,Akbas B,Sutchiewcharn N,et al.Inelastic behaviors of steel shear tab connections[J].The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,2014,23(12):929-946. [3] Fischer E C,Varma A H.Fire behavior of composite beams with simple connections:Benchmarking of numerical models[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2015,111:112-125. [4] Al Hijaj Mutaz,Mahamid M.Parametric study and design procedure for skewed extended shear-tab connections[J].Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction,2017,22(3).DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000317. [5] 姚淇誉,张耀春.薄钢混凝土柱穿心肋板铰接节点试验研究[J].低温建筑技术,2008(6):68-70. [6] 姜俊铭.钢管混凝土柱-钢箱梁螺栓装配式节点性能研究[D].上海:同济大学,2020. [7] 沈祖炎,李国强,陈以一.钢结构学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005. [8] 崔瑶,吴天骄,肖明,等.单板梁柱铰接节点抗连续倒塌能力分析[C]//中国钢结构协会结构稳定与疲劳分会第16届(ISSF-2018)学术交流会暨教学研讨会论文集.2018. [9] Gong Y L.Shear tab to hollow structural section column connections[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2014,41(8):739-747. [10] AISC.Steel Construction Manual.American Institute of Steel Construction[S].Chicago:Illinois,2011. [11] Jaspart J P,Weynand K.Design of joints in steel and composite structures (Eurocode 3:design of steel structures,part 1-8:Design of joints/Eurocode 4:design of composite steel and concrete structures)[M].Ernst & Sohn:ECCS,2016. [12] Wang J F,Spencer B F.Experimental and analytical behavior of blind bolted moment connections[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2013,82:33-47.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 254
- HTML全文浏览量: 76
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0