Ultimate Seismic Resistance and Strong Column Construction Measure of Steel-Concrete Composite Frame Structures Under Horizontal Earthquake
-
摘要: “强柱弱梁”是当前国际上主流的工程结构抗震设计理念,已有地震灾害调查表明,由于地震作用机制的复杂性以及对工程结构极限抗震认识的不足,强震作用后框架结构除出现梁铰的“强柱弱梁”破坏之外,还出现整体倒塌、柱铰以及局部楼层倒塌的“强梁弱柱”破坏。
为合理认识各类破坏形式,首先对传统的塑性铰概念细分为“压铰”和“拉铰”,指出“拉铰”容易引发结构整体失稳;随后以钢-混凝土组合框架结构为对象,建立并采用实体单元与壳单元为主的组合框架结构有限元精细化抗震计算模型,开展组合结构极限抗震分析,初步探讨各水平地震波工况对组合框架结构位移、应力、轴压比等时程响应以及框架梁柱塑性耗能分配机制、塑性铰形成模式与失效机制的影响规律。
分析结果显示:1)柱端拉筋减小了钢管与混凝土之间滑移,从而增大了柱和框架的刚度,降低了钢管和混凝土的应变水平,增大了钢梁的应力水平;620 cm/s2及以上强度的地震波作用时,柱端拉筋构造可显著减小组合框架结构的最大层间位移角,在接近极限强度的水平地震波作用时,柱端拉筋屈服,框架梁端混凝土板纵筋一般不易屈服;2)“强梁弱柱”组合框架表现为“约束梁”与“耗能柱”,此时框架梁对框架柱约束较强,框架以框架柱耗能为主而梁端仅形成“压铰”,此时框架的耗能能力取决于框架柱;“强柱弱梁”组合框架表现为“耗能梁”与“承载柱”,此时框架梁对框架柱约束较弱,框架以框架梁耗能为主使得梁端先形成“压铰”,当梁端耗能至极限时形成“拉铰”引发框架柱长细比增大,导致框架加速失效,不利于发挥框架柱耗能潜力;3)柱端拉筋技术的“强柱”构造将提高组合结构的刚度、塑性耗能与抗倒塌能力,强柱构造对以柱耗能为主的6层框架抗震能力提升尤其显著。Abstract: “Strong column and weak beam” is the current international mainstream seismic design concept of engineering structures. The investigation of existing earthquake disasters have shown that due to the complexity of earthquake action mechanism and the lack of understanding of the ultimate earthquake resistance of engineering structures, frame structures after strong earthquakes will not only appear “strong column and weak beam” damage caused by beam hinges, but also “strong beam and weak column” damage caused by the overall collapse, column hinges and local floor collapse.
In order to reasonably understand the various failure forms, the author first subdivided the traditional concept of plastic hinge into “compression hinge” and “tension hinge”, and pointed out that “tension hinge” is likely to cause the overall loss of the structure; then taking the steel-concrete composite frame structure as the object, the refined finite element seismic calculation model of composite frame structure based on solid element and shell element was established and used to carry out the ultimate seismic resistance of composite structure, and preliminarily discussed the effects of various horizontal seismic wave conditions on the displacement, stress, axial compression ratio and other time history responses of composite frame structure, as well as the distribution mechanism of plastic energy dissipation, the formation mode of plastic hinge and failure mechanism of frame beam column were preliminarily discussed.
The analysis results show that: 1) The tie bars stiffened column end reduce the slip between the steel tube and the concrete, thus increase the stiffness of the column and the frame, reduce the strain level of the steel tube and concrete, and increase the stress level of the steel beam. Under the action of seismic waves with intensity of 620 cm/s2 and above, the “strong column” construction of the column end tie bars can significantly reduce the maximum inter story displacement angle of the composite frame structure. The column end tie bars yield when the horizontal seismic wave is close to the ultimate strength, and the frame beam end longitudinal reinforcement of concrete slab is generally not easy to yield; 2) The “strong beam and weak column” composite frame is shown as “constrained beam” and “energy dissipating column”, at this time, the frame beams strongly restrain the frame column, and the frame mainly consumes energy from the frame column. The beam ends only form “compression hinges”, at this time, the energy dissipation capacity of the frame depends on the frame columns. The “strong column and weak beam” composite frame appears as “energy dissipating beams” and “load-bearing columns”, at this point, the frame beam is weakly constrained to the frame column, the frame is based on the energy consumption of the frame beams so that the beam ends form a “compression hinge”. When the energy consumption of the beam ends reaches the limit, a “tension hinge” is formed, which causes the frame column slenderness ratio to increase, and then leads to accelerated failure of the frame, which is not conducive to the use of frame columns energy dissipation potential; 3) The “strong column” construction of the tie bars stiffened column end technology will improve the stiffness, plastic energy dissipation, and anti-collapse ability of the composite structure, in particular, the seismic capability of the 6-storey frame with energy dissipation column. -
卢啸, 陆新征, 李梦珂, 等. 地震作用设计参数调整对框架结构抗震设计及安全性的影响[J]. 工程力学, 2017(4):27-36. 熊立红, 兰日清, 王玉梅, 等. 芦山7. 0级强烈地震建筑结构震害调查[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(4):35-43. 孙柏涛, 张桂欣. 汶川8. 0级地震中各类建筑结构地震易损性统计分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012(5):34-38. 周颖,吕西林. 智利地震钢筋混凝土高层建筑震害对我国高层结构设计的启示[J]. 建筑结构学报,2011,32(5):17-23. 滕军,曹冬雪,李祚华,等. 框架结构强柱弱梁地震破坏模式形成探讨[J]. 建筑结构,2011,41(增刊1):285-290. 王成. 玉树4·14地震建筑结构震害调查与分析[J]. 建筑结构,2010,40(8):106-109. 王亚勇. 汶川地震建筑震害启示:三水准设防和抗震设计基本要求[J]. 建筑结构学报,2008,29(4):26-33. Jin S, Van Dam T, Wdowinski S. Observing and understanding the Earth system variations from space geodesy[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2013, 72(12):1-10. Lew M, Naeim F, Carpenter L D, et al. The significance of the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake[J]. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2010, 19(8):826-837. Naeim F, Lew M, Carpenter L D, et al. Performance of tall buildings in Santiago, Chile during the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake[J]. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2011, 20(1):1-16. Sun B T, Spencer B F, Yan P L, et al. Analysis of the seismic vulnerability of buildings in the Lushan Ms 7. 0 earthquake in the Sichuan Province of China[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2019(3):1-2. Gong M S, Yang Y Q, Xie L L. Seismic damage to reinforced concrete frame buildings in the Lushan Ms 7. 0 earthquake[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 33(3):1-16. Yön B, Onat O, Önc M E. Earthquake, damage to nonstructural elements of reinforced concrete buildings during 2011 van seismic sequence[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2019, 33(6). DOI:10. 1061/(ASCE). CF. 1943-5509. 0001341. Alih S C, Vafaei M. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings and wooden structures during the 2015 Mw 6. 0 Sabah earthquake in Malaysia[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 102:351-368. Doganguen A. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl earthquake in Turkey[J]. Engineering Structures, 2004, 26(6):841-856. 中国地震局. 中国地震动参数区划图:GB 18306-2015[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2015. Ding F X, Ying X Y, Zhou L C, et al. Unified calculation method and its application in determining the uniaxial mechanical properties of concrete[J]. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China, 2011, 5(3):381-393. Zhou Q S, Fu H W, Ding F X, et al. Seismic behavior of a new through-core connection between concrete-filled steel tubular column and composite beam[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019,155:107-120. Ding F X, Yin G A, Wang L P, et al. Seismic performance of a non-through-core connection between concrete-filled steel tubular columns and reinforced concrete beams[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2011, 110(1):14-26. 谷利雄, 丁发兴, 张鹏, 等. 钢-混组合梁滞回性能非线性有限元分析[J]. 工程力学,2013,30(1):301-306. 张鹏, 丁发兴,龚永智, 等. 圆钢管混凝土组合框架滞回性能有限元分析[C]//全国第十二届混凝土结构基本理论及工程应用学术会议论文集. 杭州:浙江大学出版社, 2012:46-50. Ding F X, Yin G A, Jiang L Z, et al. Composite frame of circular CFST column to steel-concrete composite beam under lateral cyclic loading[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 122:137-146. 周栋梁,钱稼茹,方小丹. 环梁连接的RC梁-钢管混凝土柱框架试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2004, 37(5):7-15. 丁发兴,朱江,罗靓, 等. 钢-混凝土组合空间框架拟动力有限元分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2018,39(5):18-26. Ding F X, Lu D R, Bai Y, et al. Comparative study of square stirrup-confined concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns under axial loading[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 98(1):443-453. Ding F X, Luo L, Wang L P, et al. Pseudo-static tests of terminal stirrup-confined concrete-filled rectangular steel tubular columns[J]. Journal of Construction Steel Research,2018,144(5):135-152.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 385
- HTML全文浏览量: 88
- PDF下载量: 23
- 被引次数: 0