Analysis on the Hysteretic Behavior of Special Truss Moment Frame Connections
-
摘要: 1994年美国北岭地震、1995年日本阪神地震的灾害调查发现传统抗弯钢框架结构的梁柱连接节点出现了大量的脆性破坏, 导致具有良好延性行为的抗弯钢框架结构变形能力未能得到充分发挥, 结构整体抗震性能较差。因此, 梁柱连接节点性能的优劣成为决定抗弯钢框架结构抗震性能好坏的关键因素。为适应公共建筑跨度大的特点, 国内外一些大型公共建筑(如医院、商场、体育场馆等)逐渐采用特殊桁架式钢框架结构(简称STMF)。STMF结构具有抗侧刚度大、水平承载力高、耗能性能优良等优点, 具有广阔的应用前景。但钢桁架与钢柱之间的连接节点易于断裂, 特别是腹杆、弦杆与钢柱的连接焊缝处极易脆断, 导致STMF结构的延性及变形能力较差。目前, 国内外学者对STMF连接节点的研究仍相对较少, 不利于STMF结构的工程推广应用。为明晰STMF连接节点的滞回性能, 以STMF结构的边柱节点作为研究对象, 通过有限元方法分析了STMF连接节点的受力特征, 明晰了相关设计参数对其滞回性能的影响, 为其工程应用提供参考。首先, 设计了STMF连接节点的BASE试件, 利用CAD程序建立其三维几何模型, 使用Hypermesh程序对其进行了网格划分, 采用ABAQUS程序建立了微观有限元模型并进行了滞回性能分析。其次, 在BASE试件的基础上, 衍生设计了3个系列STMF连接节点, 重点考察了弦杆截面、桁架高度、端斜腹杆截面等主要因素对其滞回性能、抗弯承载力、变形能力、屈服模式、应力分布的影响。分析发现: STMF连接节点中桁架下弦杆的Mises应力水平相对较高, 端节间的下弦杆在弹塑性阶段易出现整体失稳, 加载后期还会出现局部失稳; 随着弦杆截面的增加, STMF连接节点的抗弯承载力、初始转动刚度、耗能能力均呈增大趋势, 但对STMF连接节点滞回曲线的形状影响较小; 随着桁架高度的增加, STMF连接节点的抗弯承载力、初始转动刚度均呈显著增加趋势, 其耗能能力略呈增大趋势但破坏模式并未显著改变; 在桁架端部斜腹杆未屈曲的前提下, 改变端斜腹杆截面对STMF连接节点的滞回性能、抗弯承载力、节点转动刚度、耗能能力影响不明显, 其受力模式和应力分布并未发生显著改变。Abstract: The brittle failure of traditional beam-to-column connections in moment resisting steel frame was found in the investigation reports of Northridge earthquake (1994) and Kobe earthquake (1995), which led to the poor ductility and deformation capacity of moment resisting steel frame. Therefore, the behavior of beam-to-column connections became a key factor that affected the seismic behavior of moment resisting steel frame. To adapt to the characteristics of large-span public buildings (such as hospitals, shopping malls, stadiums, etc.), the Special Truss Moment Frame (STMF) was attempted to use in some large public building. The STMF structure had the large lateral stiffness, high lateral bearing capacity, and great energy dissipation capacity, which had a wide application prospects. However, the beam-to-column connection between steel column and truss beam was easy to break, especially at the joint weld of chord and steel column, which led to the poor overall ductility and deformation ability of STMF structure. At present, the relative researches on the STMF connections were still small, which was not conducive to the engineering application of STMF structure. In order to clarify the hysteretic behavior of STMF connection, the side beam-to-column STMF connection was selected as the research object. The mechanical characteristics of STMF connection was analyzed through the finite element method, and the effects of the main relative design parameters on its hysteretic behavior were systematically evaluated that could provide reference for its engineering application.Firstly, the BASE specimen of STMF connection was designed in this study, and the three dimensional geometry models were established and meshed by CAD and HyperMesh program, respectively. The ABAQUS program was adopted to build the micro finite element model and to conduct the cyclic analysis. Secondly, the three series STMF connections were designed on the basis of BASE specimen, and the main design parameters, such as chord section, truss height, and end diagonal web member section, on its hysteretic behavior, moment resisting capacity, deformation capacity, yielding mode, and Mises stress distribution, were considered.The analytical results showed that the Mises stress was considerably high at the bottom chord member in STMF connection. The bottom chord member of end segment occurred the overall and local buckling at the nonlinear stage. With the increase of chord section, the moment resisting bearing capacity, and initial rotation stiffness of STMF connection took on the increasing tendency, but had the slight influence on the hysteretic loop shape. With the increase of truss height, the moment resisting bearing capacity and initial rotation stiffness, and energy dissipation also exhibited the increasing tendency except that the energy dissipation had a slight influence, but had the little effect on the failure mode. Under the consideration of non-weaken inclined end web member, the section of inclined end web member did not produce any obvious effect on the hysteretic behavior of STMF connections.
-
Key words:
- truss /
- beam-to-column connection /
- hysteretic behavior /
- finite element analysis
-
[1] Goel S C, Itani A. Seismic-resistant special truss-moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(6): 1781-1797. [2] Goel S C, Itani A. Seismic behavior of open-web truss-moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(6): 1763-1780. [3] Basha H S, Goel S C. Special truss moment frames with vierendeel middle panel[J]. Engineering Structures, 1995, 17(5): 352-358. [4] Goel S C, Leelataviwat S, Stojadinovic B. Steel moment frames with ductile girder web opening[J]. Engineering Journal, 1997, 34(4): 115-125. [5] Parra-montesinos G J, Goel S C, Kim K Y. Behavior of steel double-channel built-up chords of special truss moment frames under reversed cyclic bending[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132(9): 1343-1351. [6] Chao S H, Jiansinlapadamrong C, Simasathien S, et al. Full-scale testing and design of special truss moment frames for high-seismic areas[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(3). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002541. [7] Pekcan G, Linke C, Itani A. Damage avoidance design of special truss moment frames with energy dissipating devices[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(6): 1374-1384. [8] Chao S H, Goel S C. A modified equation for expected maximum shear strength of the special segment for design of special truss moment frames[J]. Engineering Journal, 2008, 45(2): 117-125. [9] Yang T Y, Li Y J, Leelataviwat S. Performance-based design and optimization of buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frame[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2014, 28(6). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000558. [10] Wongpakdee N, Leelataviwat S, Goel S C, et al. Performance-based design and collapse evaluation of buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frames[J]. Engineering Structures, 2014, 60: 23-31. [11] Abdollahzadeh G R, Ashari A A, Sazjini M. Seismic fragility assessment of special truss moment frames (STMF) using the capacity spectrum method[J]. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 2015, 48(1): 1-8. [12] Yang T Y, Li Y J, Goel S C. Seismic performance evaluation of long-span conventional moment frames and buckling-restrained knee-braced truss moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(1). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001333. [13] Jiansinlapadamrong C, Park K S, Hooper J, et al. Seismic design and performance evaluation of long-span special truss moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145(7). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002340. [14] 郭兵, 王金涛, 刘川川, 等. X形弱腹杆式延性桁框结构探讨[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(8): 119-125. [15] Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V. Failure mode control and seismic response of dissipative truss moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 138(11): 1388-1397. [16] Kim J K, Park J. Design of special truss moment frames considering progressive collapse[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2014, 14(2): 331-343. [17] SAC. Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing and documentation of beam-column connection test and other experimental specimens: SAC/BD-97/02[S]. Sacramento: SAC Joints Venture, 1997.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 275
- HTML全文浏览量: 44
- PDF下载量: 17
- 被引次数: 0