Seismic Performance of Steel Frame-Coupled Steel Plate Shear Wall Structures with Different Coupling Ratio
-
摘要: 联肢钢板剪力墙是用连梁将两片钢板剪力墙连接起来形成的一种新型抗侧力体系。联肢钢板墙通过连梁与墙肢的相互作用,抵抗倾覆弯矩的能力和抗侧刚度得到提高。连梁是影响联肢钢板剪力墙抗震性能的关键构件,耦联比是衡量墙肢相互作用的重要参数。因此提出以耦联比为控制指标的设计方法,分别以20%、40%和60%的耦联比设计了3个20层的钢框架-联肢钢板墙结构。利用ABAQUS软件建立结构有限元模型,振型分解反应谱分析的结果表明:这三个模型的各项结构性能指标差别在5%以内,说明在设计地震剪力相同的情况下,采用以耦联比为控制指标的设计方法,可以设计出满足预期结构性能指标的钢框架-联肢钢板墙结构,且耦联比会影响联肢钢板墙的用钢量。
联肢钢板剪力墙中,边框柱的用钢量远大于其他构件的用钢量。当设计地震剪力相同时,随着设计目标耦联比增大,连梁设计截面增大,连梁与墙肢的相互作用加强,可以减小内嵌钢板厚度,从而减小边框柱截面尺寸。而连梁的剪力和弯矩会随耦联比的增大而增大,连梁剪力增大会减小与之相连的边框内柱的轴力,但连梁弯矩增大会加大边框内柱的弯矩。因此耦联比增大到一定程度后,按压弯构件设计的边框内柱截面尺寸可能会不减反增。这3个模型中,40%耦联比模型的用钢量最少,经济性最好。
选取7条地震波对这3个模型进行了时程分析。在多遇地震下,3个模型的基底剪力平均值基本相同。在罕遇地震下,40%耦联比模型的基底剪力平均值最大,层间位移角平均值却最小,说明结构进入塑性的程度较小,刚度退化没有另外两个模型明显。罕遇地震作用下,3个模型都是钢板首先进入塑性,耦联比越小,连梁的塑性发展就越深入;耦联比越大,钢板的塑性发展就越深入。60%耦联比模型的塑性耗能较大,其钢板的最大等效塑性应变远大于另外两个模型的,而连梁仍保持弹性。由单一构件耗能对钢材的塑性要求较高,因此20%和40%耦联比模型的构件塑性发展更为合理。
给模型施加倒三角分布模式的水平荷载,进行静力弹塑性分析,得到基底剪力-顶层位移角曲线和刚度-顶层位移角曲线。根据构件的屈服顺序将推覆全过程曲线划分为8个阶段。观察全过程曲线可知,这3个模型的破坏顺序为:钢板屈服→连梁屈服→框梁梁端屈服→框柱柱脚屈服,说明3个钢框架-联肢钢板墙模型都具有良好的延性,符合结构设计性能目标。Abstract: Coupled steel plate shear wall is a new type of lateral force resisting system which is formed by connecting two steel plate shear walls with coupling beams. Through the interaction of coupling beam and wall limb, the capacity of resisting overturning moment and lateral stiffness of the coupled steel plate wall are improved. Coupling beam is the key component that affects the seismic performance of coupled steel plate shear wall, and coupling ratio is an important parameter to measure the wall limb interaction. Therefore, a design method with coupling ratio as control index is proposed. Three 20-story steel frame-coupled steel plate wall structures are designed with coupling ratios of 20%, 40% and 60%, respectively. The finite element model of the structure is established by using ABAQUS software, and the results of mode-decomposition response spectrum analysis show that the difference of each structural performance index of the three models is less than 5%, which indicates that the steel frame-coupled steel plate wall structure can be designed to meet the expected structural performance by using the design method with coupling ratio as the control index under the same design seismic shear force. The coupling ratio will affect the steel consumption of steel plate wall.
In the coupled steel plate shear wall, the steel consumption of frame column is much larger than that of other components. When the design seismic shear force is the same, with the increase of the design target coupling ratio, the design section of coupling beam increases, and the interaction between coupling beam and wall limb is strengthened, which can reduce the thickness of embedded steel plate and reduce the section size of frame column. On the other hand, the shear force and bending moment of coupling beam will increase with the increase of coupling ratio. The increase of coupling beam shear force will reduce the axial force of the frame inner column connected with it, but the increase of coupling beam bending moment will increase the bending moment of the frame inner column. Therefore, when the coupling ratio increases to a certain extent, the cross-section size of the inner column may increase instead of decreasing. Among the three models, the 40% coupling ratio model has the least steel consumption and the best economy.
Seven seismic waves are selected for time-history analysis of the three models. Under frequent earthquakes, the average values of base shear of the three models are basically the same. Under rare earthquake, the average value of base shear of 40% coupling ratio model is the largest, but the average value of interstory drift angle is the smallest, which indicates that the degree of plasticity of the structure is small, and the stiffness degradation is not obvious as the other two models. The smaller the coupling ratio is, the deeper the plastic development of coupling beam is. The larger the coupling ratio is, the deeper the plastic development of steel plate is. However, the maximum equivalent plastic strain of the steel plate is much larger than that of the other two models, while the coupling beam remains elastic. Therefore, the 20% and 40% coupling models are more reasonable than the models.
The horizontal load of inverted triangle distribution mode is applied to the model, and the static elastic-plastic analysis is carried out to obtain the base shear-top drift angle curve and the stiffness-top drift angle curve. According to the yield order of the members, the whole process of pushover curve is divided into eight stages. The failure order of the three models is:steel plate yield→ coupling beam yield→ frame beam end yield → frame column base yield, which indicates that the three steel frame-coupling steel plate wall models have good ductility and meet the structural design performance objectives.-
Key words:
- steel plate shear wall /
- coupled wall /
- coupling ratio /
- seismic performance
-
[1] 于金光,党晨,郝际平,等. 半刚性部分组合框架-钢板剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2019,40(7):109-118. [2] 殷占忠,李锦铭,赵帅鹏. 带PEC柱的钢板剪力墙结构抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2018,51(5):139-144. [3] 聂建国,朱力, 樊健生, 等. 钢板剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013,34(1):61-69. [4] 王先铁,周超,贾贵强,等. 方钢管混凝土柱框架内置中间开洞薄钢板墙结构抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2015,36(8):16-23. [5] Sabouri-ghomi S, Mamazizi S. Experimental investigation on stiffened steel plate shear walls with two rectangular openings[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 86:56-66. [6] Gholipour M, Alinia M. Behavior of multi-story code-designed steel plate shear wall structures regarding bay width[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 122:40-56. [7] Li C H, Tsai K C, Chang J T, et al. Cyclic test of a coupled steel plate shear wall substructure[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41:1277-1299. [8] Borello D J, Fahnestock L A. Behavior and mechanisms of steel plate shear walls with coupling[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 74:8-16. [9] Borello D J, Fahnestock L A. Seismic design and analysis of steel plate shear walls with coupling[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2013, 139:1263-1273. [10] Wang M, Borello D J, Fahnestock L A. Boundary frame contribution in coupled and uncoupled steel plate shear walls[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 47:2355-2380. [11] Pavir A, Shekastehband B. Hysteretic behavior of coupled steel plate shear walls[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 133:19-35. [12] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 362
- HTML全文浏览量: 125
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0